Signals
A buying signal is a specific, dated, publicly verifiable event that indicates a company is likely entering a purchase or vendor-evaluation window. It is a fact you can cite, not a probability score.
Ty Bibas, Founder, PulsePoint Strategic · June 30, 2026 · 6 min read
A buying signal is a specific, dated, publicly verifiable event that indicates a company is likely entering a purchase or vendor-evaluation window. Funding rounds, executive hires, acquisitions, expansions, and regulatory filings are the common examples. The defining trait is that it is a fact that happened on a date you can cite, with a public source, not a behavioral guess or a probability score. That is what separates a buying signal from intent data.
The two get confused constantly, so it is worth being exact. Intent data infers interest from anonymized browsing and content consumption, then scores an account as "warm." It is a prediction, and it is resold to many vendors at once, so it is both low-precision and non-exclusive. A buying signal is the opposite: it is an event that provably occurred. A CFO who started three weeks ago is a signal. An account that "showed intent" because someone there read two articles is a guess wearing a signal's clothing.
The practical consequence is what you can say in the first line of an email. With a signal, you can reference the actual event, "I saw you just closed your Series B," and defend it with a link. With an intent score, you cannot, because there is no concrete event to point to. One earns a reply by being relevant; the other hopes the timing happens to be right.
Most writing on buying signals lists every possible trigger and stops there. That is not very useful, because the signal types are wildly uneven in how often they occur. Across PulsePoint Strategic monitoring from March to June 2026, acquisitions were the single most common genuine buying signal at about 32 percent of observed events, and new launches were next at about 27 percent. Together, those two accounted for roughly six in ten observable buying events.
~60%
Share of observed B2B buying events that were acquisitions or new launches (PulsePoint Strategic B2B Signal Index, Mar-Jun 2026).
The rest of the picture is a long tail. Expansions were about 12 percent, hiring surges about 7 percent. Notably, funding events, which dominate business headlines, were only about 1 percent of observed buying signals. A company is far more likely to be reachable on the back of an acquisition or a launch than a raise. The full breakdown, with methodology, is in the B2B Signal Index.
A buying signal is not just an event; it is an event with a clock on it. Relevance decays, and the strongest signals decay fastest. A capital event is most actionable in the first two to three weeks, while the money is being allocated. A new executive is most open to new relationships in their first 60 to 90 days, before they consolidate around the vendors they inherited. Reach a company after that window and you are not early with a relevant angle, you are late with a generic one. A signal without a decay window is just a fact; a signal with one is a reason to send today.
So the working test for whether something is a usable buying signal is simple: can you name the event, cite the date, and link the source, and is the window still open? If yes, you have something to write to. If all you have is a rising score, you have a guess.
Sources
PulsePoint Strategic puts this into practice as a done-for-you service: we detect the signals, draft in your voice, and you approve every send. See the signal intelligence page, or run the numbers with the ROI calculator.
Book a Briefing